EIFF 2026 – Imposters

Aug 24, 2026 | Posted by in 2026, EIFF, Movies
State

After their baby is taken, a couple discovers a way to bring him home, but what returns may not be their son in Caleb Phillips’ Imposters.

Losing a child is the most intimate horror a parent can face. It reshapes how they see themselves as parents, turning protection into perceived failure even when they aren’t at fault. Kidnapping turns that fear into a constant, gnawing uncertainty. It creates an absence of answers, forces parents to imagine every possible scenario, and leaves them clinging to hope that weakens as time passes without resolution. It’s a fear defined by incompleteness.

Imposters

The map to marital bliss

Imposters leans fully into that anxiety. When Paul (Charlie Barnett) and Marie’s (Jessica Rothe) son is taken during a housewarming party to meet their new neighbours, the couple is immediately confronted with the fear that they have failed as parents. Days stretch into weeks with no progress until the local eccentric (Bates Wilder) arrives with a map to a mysterious cave that might offer a way to bring their child home. Marie seizes the opportunity and succeeds, but Paul quickly begins to suspect that the boy who returns isn’t their son.

Marie’s behaviour after bringing home what may or may not be their son is unsettling. She moves through the house as if she’s performing normality while hiding a truth she refuses to confront. Jessica Rothe handles this material with remarkable precision, creating a presence that is both compelling and deeply unnerving. She suggests a fragile grip on manufactured happiness and a determination to protect it at any cost.

Her performance becomes a study in grief and denial. Rothe shifts from a woman trying to settle into small town life to a desperate force who can’t face the possibility of losing her child again. Her shifting demeanour reveals how grief has constricted her life, and the portrayal gains intensity as she tries to hold it together.

Imposters

Just a normal person doing normal stuff

Marie’s happiness is shown to be artificial from early on, and the film makes that clear through Paul’s introduction. He’s first seen in bed with another woman, a moment that immediately reveals the marriage as a façade, and signals that nothing in this story should be taken at face value. Paul speaks with genuine joy about surviving a shooting without paralysis and praises the universe for sparing him. The scene then shifts when he puts on his wedding ring and returns to his wife, who appears unaware of his infidelity. This early contrast sets the tone for the rest of the film. It encourages the audience to question every surface detail and establishes a quiet suspicion that runs through the narrative.

Imposters excels at revealing character through small, telling choices. Paul and Marie aren’t the people they present to the world. Their inability to communicate what they need from each other has left them trapped in a marriage that no longer supports either of them. The idea of a couple staying together for their child is familiar, but the film treats it with a sense of truth rather than convenience. Details such as Paul rehearsing his greeting before he enters the house or Marie practicing an explanation for Theo’s missing birthmark show how both of them are performing roles they no longer believe in.

Theo’s absence exposes how tenuous their connection has become. Without the distraction he provides, the marriage loses its stabilising centre and begins to collapse under the weight of everything they have avoided. The film uses these moments to underline how fragile their connection has become.

Imposters

I’m happy honest

Choice and chance sit at the centre of the film’s ideas. Paul believes the universe will guide him, so he hands major decisions over to the flip of a coin. What begins as a harmless, even charming quirk quickly reveals a deeper refusal to take responsibility for his own behaviour. He cheats on his wife because the coin told him to, and he even lets it decide where they live, justifying each outcome as something fate has chosen for him. Moments like these show a man who avoids accountability by framing his choices as destiny. This mindset feeds directly into the collapse of his marriage. Paul can’t recognise that he is the source of many of their problems, and his reliance on chance becomes a way to escape the consequences of what he does.

Psychological tension fuels the film’s horror. Marie’s behaviour is increasingly unsettling, and the uncertainty around whether the child who returns from the cave is the real Theo creates a steady sense of unease. The story initially follows Paul, keeping him unaware of what Marie encountered, which allows the audience to share his confusion. It later shifts to Marie’s perspective to provide answers that are both clear and intriguing, reinforcing the film’s interest in how choice and chance shape its characters.

Pacing in the early stretch is sluggish, though it never undermines the film’s impact. The slow build eventually gives way to a more focused and energetic final act, and once the story settles into its core conflicts, the momentum carries the film with clear intent. From here, the film begins to uncover what has been withheld.

Each revelation lands with clarity and impact, and some are genuinely startling. The film uses them to explore how far people will go to keep their world intact, and Marie’s determination becomes one of its most disturbing elements. Her fear of loneliness and her refusal to let go of her child drive her to choices that raise difficult questions about redemption and whether different decisions can lead to better outcomes or if people inevitably arrive at the same place. Imposters leaves its characters, and its audience, wrestling with the unsettling possibility that some fears can’t be resolved, only lived with.

Imposters

There’s no problem, why?


Verdict

An unsettling film that turns parental fear into a focused study of identity, denial, and how choice and chance steer its characters into increasingly uneasy territory.

Overall
  • "Imposters"
4

Summary

Kneel Before…

  • Jessica Rothe’s performance
  • strong command of tension
  • thematic clarity
  • compelling ideas explored well
  • genuinely startling revelations

 

Rise Against…

  • slow early pacing

 

What did you think? Select your rating in the “User Review” box below

Sending
User Review
4 (1 vote)

We’d love to know your thoughts on this and anything else you want to discuss. You can find us on Facebook, Twitter, BlueSky and Discord or just leave a comment in the comment section below. You’ll need an account for Disqus but it’s easy to set up. Don’t forget to share your rating in the “User Review” box.