“What Is Starfleet?”

Star Trek: Strange New Worlds shifts format to a documentary style exploring Starfleet, its officers and questions what Starfleet is.

Shifting the stylistic gears of a television episode is always a risk, but it can yield a strong payoff when executed well. Most shows operate within a familiar framework, so any break from that rhythm invites audiences to rethink what they know. Strange New Worlds may not have a rigid format to disrupt, but its aesthetic is distinct enough that adopting a documentary approach feels like a deliberate shift. In this case, the change prompts viewers to question assumptions about Starfleet, refracted through a camera’s eye and Beto’s perspective.

The audience has been primed for this stylistic departure since the second episode. Beto was introduced as Ortegas’ brother, aiming to get a documentary examining Starfleet greenlit. In his later appearance, he was seen gathering footage that could contribute to the project, which served as a further signal of intent. It is unclear whether this setup was designed to ease viewers into the format shift or simply to establish Beto as a familiar presence so that his all-access role would feel natural in this episode. Either way, the decision to experiment formally was signposted from the beginning. Up to this point, Beto had been shown as a light-hearted figure, teasing his sister, flirting with Uhura, and taking an interest in the everyday operations aboard the Enterprise. What had not been clarified was his motivation for making the documentary, or how he viewed the crew through his lens.

The stylistic shift is executed with care and precision. Beto’s drone enables varied camera angles that stand apart from the usual setup, while footage from bridge stations and external views adds texture without breaking the documentary illusion. Interviews and narration handle most of the information delivery, lending the approach enough realism to feel embedded in the world rather than imposed on it. There’s clear thought behind how the episode was shot, and that care pays off.

Style alone doesn’t carry the episode. Substance has to do its share, and this one starts strong with a provocative thesis: is Starfleet a violent military organisation? “What separates a Federation from an Empire?” is put to the crew and audience, supported by commentary noting that both colonise and enforce doctrine. The documentary questions whether Starfleet officers are explorers as they claim, or soldiers in practice. The Enterprise is first described by its weapons rather than its scientific credentials. Beto enters the episode with strong bias, and the challenge becomes whether the crew will reinforce it or dismantle it.

Beto’s bias is reinforced through interviews and footage that frame Starfleet as the very thing he accuses it of being. La’an is asked for her views on killing and responds with blunt honesty: she doesn’t believe it’s acceptable, but sees it as sometimes necessary for the greater good. She insists that their mission is to avoid using weapons, with peaceful resolution always the preferred outcome. Ortegas adds that space is unpredictable, and travelling unarmed is reckless; defence must be part of exploration. Other responses touching on violence, obedience, and combat are woven throughout the episode, often subtle but thematically pointed.

M’Benga stands out thanks to his heavily redacted military record. He approaches Beto’s questions with quiet confidence and measured language, but there’s a noticeable weight to his words. He avoids specifics, yet speaks like someone who has lived through situations he’d rather not revisit. His restraint hints at regret. What he chooses not to say does just as much to support Beto’s thesis as what he does offer in response.

Uhura is the exception to Beto’s scrutiny, which may point to another form of bias given their established mutual attraction. Her interviews are filled with excitement, curiosity, and a clear desire to learn. She speaks enthusiastically about the new language she’s studying and the spacefaring creature the crew is preparing to encounter. This perspective introduces a layer of nuance early on, but the episode fails to develop that contrast. As a result, it feels less like a deliberate choice by Beto and more like a structural oversight in how the episode is put together.

Focus is also given to the classified nature of the mission depicted in the episode. It’s heavily implied -rather than explicitly stated- that Starfleet aren’t to be trusted because they classify information that they don’t want the general public to know. The suggestion is that they are unnecessarily hiding things that people have a right to know. This implication is supported by conversations recorded from the perspective of hiding and eavesdropping on a privileged discussion. The stylistic choice of the low volume muffled audio and voyeuristic camera placement presents Beto’s lens as an intrusive figure uncovering information that has been kept hidden. An impressive touch is that the Starfleet side of a communication with Pike and Una is redacted which only provides their reaction to the orders. Their contribution gives nothing away so there’s no requirement for it to be redacted but the conclusion being prompted is that something important is being withheld and that makes Starfleet untrustworthy.

Framing the documentary as a biased account with an agenda isn’t inherently flawed. Many documentaries aim to prove a point, often ignoring or reframing evidence to suit a predetermined conclusion. The problem is that Beto’s documentary never fully commits to that bias, nor does it chart a convincing journey toward a more nuanced understanding of his subject. Had the episode concluded with a critical evaluation of Beto’s work that exposed its superficial thesis and overt bias, it could have reframed the inconsistencies as character-driven. Instead, the narrative flounders between disconnected ideas, displaying little awareness of its own lack of cohesion.

Beto’s perspective on Starfleet shifts by the end of the episode, prompted by Uhura confronting him about his emotionally charged responses. She challenges his anger, linking it to unresolved feelings about his sister’s injury. His instinct to distrust any organisation that permitted such harm clouds his judgment and fuels a narrative shaped by grievance rather than understanding. Once he acknowledges this, he begins to see Starfleet differently. It becomes a source of purpose for those seeking direction, and a surrogate family for those who choose to commit.

Ending on a hopeful note risks oversimplifying the subject. Starfleet, as an institution, warrants scrutiny; accepting any organisation at face value is a mistake. Despite its stated purpose, Starfleet functions within a clearly militaristic framework. It has a rigid hierarchy, operates under military protocols, engages in combat, and acts as a defense force for the Federation during wartime. Recognising those facts raises a deeper question: is that framework inherently concerning, or do those within the organisation interpret their roles in a way that prioritises exploration and discovery over militarism?

There’s a compelling tension between what Starfleet aspires to be and what it actually is, shaped largely by the individuals within it. Beto’s bias restricts a meaningful exploration of this idea, possibly by design. He asks the wrong questions, chasing a narrow thesis that overlooks complexity. Some of the most insightful contributions come from crew members who challenge his framing. M’Benga is quietly evasive, offering little, while Pike takes a more assertive stance. He confronts Beto’s fixation with death, stating bluntly that someone who had watched another die would hardly welcome questions about the experience.

This exchange showcases Pike at his best; firm, experienced, and unwilling to entertain distractions when clarity is needed. His irritation with Beto and the camera drone carries over from a prior appearance and culminates here during a crisis that demands his full attention. In asserting boundaries, Pike reiterates a core theme: their work is unpredictable, and in moments of uncertainty, the only constant is each other.

Pike is also written with exceptional clarity in the bridge scenes. He’s authoritative and decisive, reinforcing that orders must be followed regardless of personal comfort. This rarely seen aspect of his character stands in stark contrast to the affable “space dad” persona that often dominates his screen time, making its appearance here all the more refreshing. The choice feels deliberate, underscoring the episode’s quiet reinforcement of Starfleet’s militaristic framework. Pike’s unflinching adherence to his orders and dismissal of Uhura’s request to delay action until the plan she has been working on with Spock is better developed reflect a command structure that prioritises protocol over personal insight.

The mission involves transporting a spacefaring creature that has been weaponised and delivering it to one side of a conflict. In effect, the Federation is taking a side by supplying living armament to a warring faction. Crucially, neither Beto nor the crew of the Enterprise are provided with sufficient context about the conflict or the Federation’s role within it, leaving them to form assumptions. The Enterprise crew operate under strict discipline; they are trained to follow orders without allowing personal views to interfere. Beto, however, is not bound by duty. He asks the difficult questions that even his sister refuses to answer.

As the most junior crew member, Uhura is less conditioned to follow orders without question. This allows her to consider possibilities the others overlook. The idea of initiating communication with the Jikaru is presented as her unique insight, but given the Enterprise’s stated mission of peaceful exploration, it shouldn’t be a radical suggestion. In this context, the notion that only Uhura advocates for peaceful engagement feels forced. It creates artificial tension on the bridge, especially with Pike rigidly adhering to orders he believes cannot be challenged.

What follows is a clear, practical demonstration of the values Beto’s documentary claims to explore. His lens captures a crew unified in purpose, working together to aid a creature in distress and honouring their promise to protect its young. Pike takes a decisive stand when threatened by the Lutani, calmly stating that the Federation is not an enemy to be challenged. He invokes the power and resources at their disposal, positioning them not as instruments of war but as guardians against the exploitation of living beings. It’s a firm and resonant affirmation of Starfleet’s moral stance, and of the crew’s commitment to enacting those principles.

Stylistic choices aside, the Jikaru plot will feel familiar to many viewers, not just within Star Trek, but across genre storytelling. It follows a predictable arc: an encounter with an apparently hostile creature, an attempt at communication, the revelation of benign intent, and finally, a mission to help. In this case, the twist is more tragic. The only way to help the Jikaru is to respect her wish to die on her own terms. She has been irreparably altered and refuses to continue in her corrupted state. Her final request is simple: protect her children from suffering the same fate. The crew bear witness as she ends her life by flying into the sun.

It’s a moving moment, deliberately given space to breathe, allowing the weight of the creature’s tragedy to settle. Her manipulation, and ultimate sacrifice, is quietly devastating. Notably, the documentary format is temporarily abandoned when the view from the galley is shown. Beto stands among the crew, no longer observing from the outside but bearing witness alongside them. This shift in visual language may signal a change in his perspective, as the episode adopts traditional cinematography to suggest that he is now aligned with their values. The abandonment of the documentary lens at this precise point underscores his transformation and reframes the moment as one of collective empathy.

This marks a tonal shift, with Starfleet presented as a purposeful force for good. Una describes their mission as bringing light to the darkness of space, positioning their work as a moral imperative. Other statements, like “We make Starfleet what it is, not the other way around,” suggest that the organisation’s value lies in the people who embody principles of curiosity, tolerance, and empathy. These sentiments cast Starfleet’s ethos not as institutional doctrine but as a reflection of the individuals who choose to live by its ideals.

The closing emphasis on Starfleet as a surrogate family underscores a central theme. Nearly every character recalls personal tragedy that either led them to Starfleet or shaped their connection to it. Uhura speaks of losing her biological family, Ortegas describes Starfleet as giving her a level of control she lacked before, La’an alludes to the trauma of her past with the Gorn, and Spock reflects on being ostracised on Vulcan for his mixed heritage. These stories cast Starfleet not just as an organisation but as a place where misfits find belonging. It offers a renewed sense of purpose to those it finds at their lowest.

Starfleet functioning as a found family for those in need is a compelling notion, but it’s also reductive. Within the context of Beto’s documentary, it risks being interpreted as a counter-bias, an effort to offset the episode’s earlier critical stance. Regardless of intention, this framing oversimplifies Starfleet’s significance for those who serve. The abundance of tragic backstories is common in modern television, and this era of Star Trek leans heavily on that pattern. Here, the implication is that Starfleet exists chiefly to offer sanctuary to people carrying trauma, which risks narrowing its identity.

The episode misses an opportunity to explore a parallel with present-day military institutions. Touching on recruitment strategies, such as offering education or stability in exchange for service, would have added a socially relevant layer for the audience to engage with. Acknowledging that Starfleet is not entirely altruistic would invite more sustained interrogation of the institution and avoid painting it with a broadly idealistic brush.

Equally absent is the perspective of someone like Pike, who chose Starfleet out of belief in its core mission. Another interview might have shown a veteran officer inspired by the stars, choosing to serve out of belief, not necessity. Including such a viewpoint would support the notion that Starfleet welcomes all, so long as they align with its ideals. The omission contributes to a lack of nuance. It may be consistent with the narrow scope of the documentary, but it remains disappointing nonetheless. In the end, the episode offers a definition of what Starfleet is, but only as a surrogate family, flattening a far more complex institution into a single, sentimental idea.

---

Verdict

An uneven episode that impresses with a shift in style but is clumsy in exploring its argument.

We’d love to know your thoughts on this and anything else you want to discuss. You can find us on Facebook, Twitter, BlueSky and Discord or just leave a comment in the comment section below. You’ll need an account for Disqus but it’s easy to set up. Don’t forget to share your rating in the “User Review” box.